<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Critiques are tough love	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dwaneknott.com/2019/01/critiques-are-tough-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dwaneknott.com/2019/01/critiques-are-tough-love/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:57:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dwane		</title>
		<link>https://dwaneknott.com/2019/01/critiques-are-tough-love/#comment-6927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dwaneknott.com/?p=11846#comment-6927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://dwaneknott.com/2019/01/critiques-are-tough-love/#comment-6926&quot;&gt;Elizabeth Drake&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree with evaluating the writer of the critique. Using an online site makes it more difficult. However, I contribute critiques on submitted works and hope they are taken critically. What touches a nerve with me doesn&#039;t make it wrong. I generally try to find fantasy to critique. Romance, poems, history are not my preferences.
Recently, I received a very detailed critique which had almost nothing to say was good. It came from a writer who I had, that day, written a tough critique. Two others found problems with my work but not to the level of this on. Needless to say, I wondered if it was payback so I matched comments with the others. Anyway, I agree some must be ignored since it is my book.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://dwaneknott.com/2019/01/critiques-are-tough-love/#comment-6926">Elizabeth Drake</a>.</p>
<p>I agree with evaluating the writer of the critique. Using an online site makes it more difficult. However, I contribute critiques on submitted works and hope they are taken critically. What touches a nerve with me doesn&#8217;t make it wrong. I generally try to find fantasy to critique. Romance, poems, history are not my preferences.<br />
Recently, I received a very detailed critique which had almost nothing to say was good. It came from a writer who I had, that day, written a tough critique. Two others found problems with my work but not to the level of this on. Needless to say, I wondered if it was payback so I matched comments with the others. Anyway, I agree some must be ignored since it is my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elizabeth Drake		</title>
		<link>https://dwaneknott.com/2019/01/critiques-are-tough-love/#comment-6926</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Drake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dwaneknott.com/?p=11846#comment-6926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Critiques are tough.

I have to evaluate the person giving the critique as well as the critique itself. 

In the end, it&#039;s my work, and I have to decide. I will say, it is HARD. I have struggled to both take and reject critiques. Sometimes they is no choice but to reject a critique when you receive two that are diametrically opposed :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critiques are tough.</p>
<p>I have to evaluate the person giving the critique as well as the critique itself. </p>
<p>In the end, it&#8217;s my work, and I have to decide. I will say, it is HARD. I have struggled to both take and reject critiques. Sometimes they is no choice but to reject a critique when you receive two that are diametrically opposed 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
